GhostShadow

Happy B-day madjo :)

The last I heard of him was when SOV sent him after me to tell me to stfu. but He is probly busy with work. I am sure he will be around agian. BUt since the torrent site went down we lost a few other good ppl. I rather miss Neomaster...

I am serious, there are only three MOD's that are pretty cool. (you take the cake tough). There is neomaster, Pella, and of course c4. Neomaster b/c he was a military man and is a good man. Pella b/c she doesnt yell at me. And you b/c you are stubborn with your ideals, but the first to admit you are wronge ( which isnt offten ), and b/c you dont yell at me very much, lol. if ever. so three cheers to c4! and "Thanks for making me feel....." WELCOME!

I think that the choice should be up to the parents as well. There was a tribe society used as an example. If the tribe can not spare the resources needed to care for the child then get rid of it. I agree. But you see in modern days there are families now, not tribes. We can not expect the government to care for these children. I believe that if the family's can not care for the child or they feel that they can not spare the resources for a disabled child then I think that its ok to let the child die. Of course there will be ppl who try to make organazations for these children to spare them from dying, but I believe that if it is run by the government it is wronge. I do not expect my government to provide such aid, and in fact I expect them not to. I dont want to see resources go to this matter. If the organazation is privatley owned, then so be it. As long as Tax money does not go to it.

Yo, I was reading through some emial stuff and came aross this. I find it quite intresting. And I must say that I agree in the euthinasia of "life unworthy of life." Killing babies

YEA!!!! I love that game. I would do that. Also Star Trek Aramda II that would be fun to play online.

oh, I will tell you the problem. THE RICH LOOSE MONEY!!!!

ah man, you guys wouldnt miss me and my contaversal issues? Kinda depressing ;) Yeah, I dont really care, I already had my brawl with the MODs and I am over it, sorta. I do wake up in the middle of the nite in a pool of sweat after my nite terrors of what the MOD's said to me tough. but there is no sense in complaining. SOV is next in line to take over, I gotta stay on his happy side ;) oh, and I just want to say that I would miss c4 ;) but plz dont leave us, you are the only cool MOD. EDIT: wait, sov.. you dont like me? That is a shame, I really like you. I am honored that I am such a pain in the ars to you that you would remember ME personaly and put my name, ;) thanks. three cheers.

I think that it would be hard to put the ENT in the time of VOY and DS9 b/c the Dominion war. I mean, war is flipping awsome, but you can do only so much with it. And I think that it would be weird seeing a fed/dom alliance. They never really allied. they just stopped fighting. But I liked ENT in that time, it was just to much like TNG and TOS though.

good apple will now fall to the might of the great MD player!

I think it can, but that's a long term goal, and you can't achieve long term goals using short term methods. War and getting "down and dirty," as you call it, are short term methods that cause long term damage that can take generations to fix. The events leading up to 9/11 started before WWI even began, and the consequences of these terrible wars are with us still. The only thing that wars ever lead to are more wars. Only peace generates peace, but peace is a long term solution, not a short term one. That's impossible, impractical, not to mention, economic suicide. I am confused here, you say that war is a short term method and peace is not. I dont uderstand that b/c the diffrence between war and peace is simple. Peace builds up to war. I think that it is impossible to matian a constant state of peace. That would require every one to be at full bliss. And yes, you can have the ppl of a country to stay happy, but that would not last. The world needs to be balanced between good and evil, and to tip the scale to ever lasting bliss could very easily lead the world to a state of major war. When you put a lot of weight on a scale then take it off it will raise very quickly while the other sides rises and there will not be an even balance for a while. That is how i see it. Also about closing the boreders it has been done before. I dont mean stop immagration completly, I mean close the borders to stop illegal immagration. Back in the day, America had very strict rules of getting into America. Only a certian ammount of ppl from europe where allowed a year, same with asia ect. Immagration was only a small stream, now it is a rageing river and I feel it has gotten out of control, but that is off topic ;) lol. I am just simply pointing out that it is an extreme measure that SHOULD be thought about if terroism gets to an extreme. It all goes back to "despreate times call for desperate measures".

well tesuo, I dont think that it was easier back in the day of WWII. ever hear of the French resitance? The Germans didnt know who was good or bad. And there where several factions in America that where Nazi and ppl did not know. During WWII, Japanese citizens gave infromation to the Japanese Empire. So agian, I dont know if it was easier, it is very easy to mislead some one. I also dont think that Terrorism can be stopped. But it can be limited. We can stop major attack that can devistate cities and such things, but a car bomb and suicide bombers are harder to stop. In order to stop these major attacks our government has to get down and dirty. Right now America has officaly declared war on all Terroism. But that is just formality, I think that it is safe to assume that the American Government will only defend America from terrorist. I agree that in order to stop terrorism we need to crack down a lot. Since this is a time of war for America I feel that if there is another major attack such as that of 9-11 then the borders need to be officaly locked by the US ARMY RESERVE and NATIONAL GUARD and declare Marshal law on major cities such as LA and NY and others and cities and commit to a mass investigation. Of cource this will require pulling the enitre army out of Iraq and the middle east in general, but I feel that it would be a risk we have to take. This would last for a few years or how ever long needed. I will say that terrorism if VARY FAR from that point of extreme measure and I hope to god that it never comes to that. But As the topic states... "Inter Arma Eniem Silent leges"

Well I think that the patriot act is a very good Idea. What is does is tap a phone number to a known terrorist. Its not like they are tapping every phone. It really ensures that ppl dont blow up central square or take down another plane and bulding. I know its not a 100% perfect way, but it does keep Americans safe. Now as far as britian, they are not as big as target as the USA. I know that they have pissed off their fair share of terrorist, but America is leading the war on terror so it makes sense that terrorist would rather kill Americans. So britian really doesnt need such massive plans, imo.

I disagree, War is war. In war the goal of the enemy is to over come you. Even in a war on terrorism i feel that it is still the goverments hights order to protect the citizens of its country. If you say that there is an impending attack that could devistate a city, say.. uhmm... nuclear attack, by a terrorist group. I Feel that it is ok for the government to beat the living shjt out of a prisoner to obtain knowlage to stop such an attack. If that is what you mean by the laws falling silent....

well, I think that laws are all well and good in a time peace. but war is dark and dirty, the players need to get dirty if need be. The priamry objective of government is to protect the citizens. The very first governments where made out of protection of land and people. in war, winning is like the omega directive, all other priorities are recinded.

is that how they amde that eps of DS9 trils and tribbels? that was a great eps btw. oh and of cource the MPAA is gonna go agisnt it, they want more money.

ben franklin said. " thoes who sacrifice liberty for security diserve neither ". I think that it can be applied to situations. And I do think that war has no rules, just limits.

uhmm one theory is that Borg where created by Vger. You can go to here.

I agree, and the more things that change, there is just that many more things that can go wronge. I mean, not even the trek world is perfect. Ever watch the eps of DS9 "in pale moonlight" where sisko brings the romulans into the war. He was arguing the finner points of morality aginst the survial of the federation, and he chose to save the federation. Its in our nature to do what we think is best. And what is always best is not what we always think is best.

can you guys get Comcast over there in the UK? Its great, and they keep your info secret for ya. And you pay for what you want. So you do get what you pay for.

I dont get any sound when I play it... ok, I got it now, lmao. Its a great song

yeah, I use that. i make web pages for school. I love that program. It soo easy. I like page b also

well, it seems cool. Doesnt seem to safe but w.e

Chimpanzees have the bigger balls, actually, but I don't see them ruling the world, . . . . Then again, . . . maybe they're planning something. Planet of the Apes, anyone? ;) who do you think is in control of America, a bunch of apes. lol ;)