halojones Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 BSG 75 BSP 62 Why would a brand new state of the art battlestar have a lower Ident number to the oldest in fleet, about to be resigned battlestar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
picarddelta4 Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 I had the same thought, equally at a loss to explain it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halojones Posted February 21, 2006 Author Share Posted February 21, 2006 I guess they might explain it later, with a newly commissioned ship taking the rank fleet insigna of an old decomissioned one (like enterpirce takeing an 'a' 'b' etc) and the Galactia retaining its high number as it wasn't phased out yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mav Posted February 22, 2006 Share Posted February 22, 2006 I say it was replaced. Ship A is the flagship of the fleet, the biggest, the strongest, our best. Ship A grows old over the years and a new stronger bigger design is made. Ship A then becomes decommissioned, and Ship B takes over as flagship for Ship A, whereas Ship B then retains certain characteristics. Much like how say, the Enterprise has had various encarnations and minor changes to class/designation, Battlestars are probably the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celestra Posted February 22, 2006 Share Posted February 22, 2006 It makes no sense to me either. One explanation of registry numbers I have states that "Registry Numbers are the order in which a vessel was procured, not constructed." So you could have a few completed battlestars which may get procured by the government in a different order than which they were completed so this would be reflected in the registry numbers. This explanation came from Galactica blueprints from the 1978 show, so obviously RDM can do what he wants with the numbers in TNS. Which he has because in TOS the Pegasus was BSC-067 not BSG-62 (it is definitely BSG not BSP). On a side note can anyone confirm that BSC (BattleStarCarrier) was used in TOS? I have it all on DVD but have not had the time to watch through it all to check :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starbucknaked Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 I believe that there may yet be brothers of man...sorry, I believe that the Pegasus is a different class of BattleStar, so this would explain the ID #, Galatica would have to be one of the "newer" old Battlestars to still be servicable and Pegasus would be a new class battlestar so the IDs would have no direct correlation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vyperion Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 Maybe it's a division number Pegasus might be part of the 62nd Battlegroup and Galactica part of the 75th. Say for example the 'Achilles' (completely made up example name) was a sister ship to the Galactica - both the old model - but was part of the 62nd division. It is destroyed for whatever reason (accident, battle, natural disaster) and a new ship is brought in to replace it in that same division so the 62nd gets a brand new ship, Pegasus, while the 75th stilll gets by with the older model, Galactica. If newer designs are availbale would you keep making older models and bearing in mind the beurocracy during peacetime they wouldn't replace military hardware that still worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now