Engineer101 Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 humans.... easier to kill....now if we had clone humans. there will be a infinite supply for soldiers (yes i support human cloning because it can be use for a greater cause) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingenier03 Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 humans.... easier to kill....now if we had clone humans. there will be a infinite supply for soldiers (yes i support human cloning because it can be use for a greater cause) Well begin the Clone Army on a remote planet in a system erased from the database. And make sure the have standard energy rifles. *Insert Imperial March here* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Relentless Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 humans.... easier to kill....now if we had clone humans. there will be a infinite supply for soldiers (yes i support human cloning because it can be use for a greater cause) Just don't use my blood or clone me or I'll get nastily peeved :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engineer101 Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 actually im thinkin of using the DNA genes from the best german, british, russian and american soldier that was a hero and last i heard. Adolf Hitler's DNA is impossible to find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
96611 Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 humans.... easier to kill....now if we had clone humans. there will be a infinite supply for soldiers (yes i support human cloning because it can be use for a greater cause)Well, if you want to feed them, clothe them and generally spend money looking after them for 16-18 years (assuming no scifi accelerated growth) you can. I'd just recruit normal humans and stick them through a 9 month (Basic soldiers) to 2 year (officer/advanced specialist) training program. And believe me, I'd be able to get a lot larger army for the same cash outlay, and sooner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VonHelton Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 actually im thinkin of using the DNA genes from the best german' date=' british, russian and american soldier that was a hero and last i heard. Adolf Hitler's DNA is impossible to find.[/quote'] Cloning heroes won't get you more of them........LOL! Heroes are forged in the fires of battle. B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engineer101 Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 or we create the SPARTAN Program. we kidnap 6 year olds and flash clone them then begin a 14 year training program. Refer to the Halo books and the game Halo for more on the SPARTANs. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psheldrake1 Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 humans.... easier to kill....now if we had clone humans. there will be a infinite supply for soldiers (yes i support human cloning because it can be use for a greater cause) Actually, humans are hard to kill. They think, adapt to change. My thoughts would be is to put all the drug addicts on the front lines. If they die, who cares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dthdlr1488 Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 I prefer zyclon B as far as a weapon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engineer101 Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 robot soldiers are the future!!. replace human soldiers with intelligent adapting Robotic AI. but the Command Central for them is not the AI itself. but a Human Command Center Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psheldrake1 Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 The US is there now. With their remote planes. Computerized bombs. They just haven't got to the soldiers yet. To many expendable people still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VonHelton Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 The US is there now. With their remote planes. Computerized bombs. They just haven't got to the soldiers yet. To many expendable people still. Terminator here we come! :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engineer101 Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 im thinking droids like from star wars lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oma Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 I prefer zyclon B as far as a weapon! "It's time for your shower!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engineer101 Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 lets send vonhelton to battle our enemies, he seems to do a good job at it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psheldrake1 Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 You don't have enough money for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svendopel Posted March 17, 2005 Share Posted March 17, 2005 As a military man I would want the original Spartans on my side. They lived for battle and their enemies died for it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asmodeusca Posted March 17, 2005 Share Posted March 17, 2005 Projectiles have the edge I think. True, energy weapons travel the speed of light and current projectiles are relatively slow. However, projectiles have mass and therefore can be fired at any relative speed (faster than light). Well...in a Star Trek world anyway. I would think an energy weapon would be limited to the speed of light. Wouldn't want to fire that at warp :cyclops: Besides, with projectiles you can fool with three factors....velocity, mass and payload. That gives you lots of options. I.e. if you are shooting at a ship velocity and payload are likely key......if you are shooting a planet I would focus on mass :) B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellsfury Posted March 17, 2005 Share Posted March 17, 2005 Energy or projectile...it seems Americans are favouring both at the moment...check this little nugget... http://www.newscientist.com/channel/mech-tech/mg18524894.500 I actually felt sick when I read it...I've put up with news of Microwave bombs to disable electronics (say bye-bye to pace-makers, heart monitors, incubators, public transport) and mini-nukes (no more unsightly dismemberment) but this supposedly "pacifist" weapon is the absolute height of science going terribly wrong. Using a charming laser beam to explode a wave of plasma (SUPERHEATED GAS???) on a person to "pacify" them is to me deplorable. For one thing think of the excruciating burns, the shock to the nervous system (say bye-bye to granny or anyone with weak hearts)...we have water cannons, taser guns, tear gas etc but do we really need anti-pain research turned on its head like this? For all of you good Americans out there put a stop to it!! Before you and the rest of us suffer... I know it's a rant but its on a weapons thread...why not... Energy weapons...just for the chance to "stun" rather than kill and the Trekkie ones just make you sleep for a bit...better than Nytol... :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psheldrake1 Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Interesting read. I'm just glad Canada is to cheap to buy stuff like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now