superman9595 Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I vote for Voyager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFMF Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Yep Voyager - Defiant had trouble disabeling an Excelseor (sp?) class Starship even if it was a modified one. Voyager has proven it can be tough - it went up against many borb vessels - The Tactical Cube for instance - gave that cube a shock considering it's so much larger and more powerful. The Defiant was almost destroyed on it's first mission...(well so was Voyager but Voyager is better in my opinion....even though i like DS9 better....ok - SHUT UP TFMF :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superman9595 Posted November 7, 2005 Author Share Posted November 7, 2005 Voyager: Weaponry specifications Main Ship Type X Collimated Phaser Arrays Phaser Arrays: 13(Type X) Fore & Aft Torpedo Launchers: 4 Max. Volley Spread: 12 (3 per launcher) Mark IX Photon Torpedo warheads Tri-Cobalt Devices Transphasic Torpedoes (Limited Complement, received by future Vice Admiral Janeway ) Multi-Spatial Charges Defensive Countermeasures Specifications Automatic Ultra-Rapid Remodulating Regenerative Deflector Shields Standard FSQ Primary Force Field & Deflector Control System Ablative armor Plating Heavy Duranium/Tritanium Hull Plating(Multiple Layers) Hull Reinforced Tetraburnium Alloy Plating Borg adapted Unimatrix Shielding Metaphasic Shielding Warp Engine specifications Warp Core Reactor: M/ARA Class IX Propulsion System: 2 Quantum Slipstream 24 coil low distortion Variable Geometry warp Nacelles Normal Cruise Speed: Warp 8 Maximum Cruise Speed: Warp 9 Maximum Sustainable Warp Speed: Warp 9.975 (limit of 36 hours maximum) Tricylclic Input Manifolds Fuel (Matter Injector): cold deuterium Fuel (Matter Injector): Quantum Dilithium crystals, Zenonite crystals Fuel (Antimatter Injector): anti-hydrogen Fuel (Antiproton Injector): antimatter Fuel Replenishment: Bussard ramjet Collectors 2 matter-antimatter transkinetic reactor mix chambers 2 Auxilliary backup redundant power distribution warp core reactors(Class VII reactors) 8 Negative Polarity Hydrogen-based Ionized Liquid Plasma Coolant towers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lymbery Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I vote voyager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenebrae Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Realistically? Defiant. In an episode? Voyager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahaha Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Defiant fires faster, quicker to maneuver, has cloak, and stronger armor. Input piecard shuffle maneuver! Watch it dance a jig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TetsuoShima Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I chose Voyager, not because it is more powerfull, but because I think it's prettier (in shipdesign) and it's a lot more comfy... :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenebrae Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I chose Voyager' date=' not because it is more powerfull, but because I think it's prettier (in shipdesign) and it's a lot more comfy... :)[/quote'] So I imagine you'd favour the QE2 over something ugly like a Battleship? ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFMF Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I think a ship that really takes your breath away is better than one that can pack a punch - Voyager could do both :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I chose Voyager' date=' not because it is more powerfull, but because I think it's prettier (in shipdesign) and it's a lot more comfy... :)[/quote'] well the defiant is a WARSHIP, even thou starfleet class it as a escort vessel, one on one then you have to favour the defiant, and it does have ablade armour (probably spelt wrong but you know what i mean). Voyagers warp engines are alot more vunrable where as the defiants are more enclosed and better protected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vektram Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 In an extended battle i'd say Voyager, in a short battle (ie. hit and run) the Defiant would be way better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quosego Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I don't know, In the games (armada II) the defiant is the most crappiest vessel you can build... And with all that ablative armor, shielding and borg warheads voyager would kick the shit (can't we say that... I thought we only couldn't say ratio) out of that little ship... But then again if you look at the DS9 series, it's supposed to be that tough warship... But I played Armada II before I saw DS9, so I'm sticking with Voyager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahaha Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I chose Voyager' date=' not because it is more powerfull, but because I think it's prettier (in shipdesign) and it's a lot more comfy... :)[/quote'] A ford crown vic with a bench seat has comfort.. that doesn't mean i'd EVER drive or own one LOL ford vs. Audi, Audi wins.. pilots preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TetsuoShima Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I chose Voyager' date=' not because it is more powerfull, but because I think it's prettier (in shipdesign) and it's a lot more comfy... :)[/quote'] A ford crown vic with a bench seat has comfort.. that doesn't mean i'd EVER drive or own one LOL ford vs. Audi, Audi wins.. pilots preference. You're forgetting the importance of the prettier part... Better comparison would be NASCAR-racecar against BMW 850 series or something along those lines... EDIT: hey this is an interestingly close poll... :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bapman Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 VOYAGER is crappy lousy ship that can't take on a KAZON battleship... yet it has managed to go one on one with a BORG tactical cube no less. :mad: It can take a hit a from a species 8472's energy cannon AND survive while a BORG cube can't... so then technically VOYAGER is tougher right !? :stare: Plus... using that specifications of the ENDGAME VOYAGER... transphasic torps and the Adaptive Armour !? Man that's a cheap way to go. :( Btw... here's DEFIANT's specifications B) ARMAMENTS Modified Type U Phaser Emitter / Pulse Phasers [Equavalant to TYPE XII Phasers] Phaser Arrays: 6 [Type U] Emitters: 12 [4 aft 8 forward] It automatically shifts phaser frequency when firing and can fire upto 4 shots per second from 6 emitters. Mark II Quantum Torpedo capable of pattern and independent firing Number: Stock 325... Max 625 Location: 4 Forward, 2 Aft Max Volley spread: 6 [1 per launcher] 1 Quntum Torpedo's firepower is equavalant of 4 Reguler TYPE IX Phtoton Torpedoes. Mark III Quad-Cobalt Torpedo Number: 15 Location: Same as Quantum Max Volley Spread: 2 1 Quad-Cobalt Torpedo has the firepower of 250 type IX Photon Torpedoes Anti-Proton Beam Number: 1 Location: Below Front Defelctor Rate or Fire and Recharge: 5 minutes per shot Apparently it is the most powerful starship mounted energy weapon used by the Federation. It's actual damage capability, compared to a Type X Phaser is unknown. Flux Torpedoes Number: Unknown Location: Same as Quantum Volley spread: No Idea Apparently its a short range torpedoe that can dirently effect the warp drive and a ship's capability to goto warp. Half the firepower of a Type IX Photon Torpedo. DEFENCES A Standard Romulan cloaking device that can be detected through bursts of polaron beams. FSQ [i have no idea what that means] Multi-Layered defelctor shields... with fast re-modulation and regenerative capability. 4 high powered Shield generators. Regenerative Ablative Armour [The Armour used by VOYAGER is a more advanced version of the Defiant armour from 15 years in the future] There are obviously lot of other things with lotsa trekbabblic capabilites but it is poinltess to say those without knowing what they mean or do. Like the Metaphasic shield of VOYAGER... wht the heck does it do !?... and I remember it being said in VOYAGER that it Mult-Spectal shield... not metaphasic... AND from when the heck did VOYAGER ever have a regenerative shielding !? DEFIANT in lotsa eps they said to get them out of a fight so that the shields can regenerate in a minute. I don't remember VOYAGER ever having that ability. Lasltly... the DEFIANT is way WAY more maneuvarable than the INTREPID... even if you COUNT the Ablative armour... it couldn't take many hits from a BORG plasma torpedoes before it started to give it away. A borg Plasma torpedo has 60 times the power of a Type IX Photon torpedo. Now imagine Defiant firing the Quad-Cobalt ones... can VOYAGER take even 10 of them if Defiant EVEN missed 5 of them !? In a realistic fight... ofcourse NOT. But as VOYAGER vs Defiant... then ofcourse... VOYAGER beats the living crap outta Defiant... screw logic and stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurion Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 I voted for Voyager just because it appears to be more resilient than the Defiant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahaha Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bapman Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 I voted for Voyager just because it appears to be more resilient than the Defiant. Depends on the plot actually... if against a KAZON... they barely escape... if against a BORG... they barely escape... If against Species 8472... they barely escape. They never just ESCAPE. n the power difference between the 3 type of ships I mentioned are enormous. Yet... VOYAGER always manged to get into the right amount of trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juhan Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 I think its a bit unfair coz defiant is smaller. Maybe 2 defiants vs voyager. That'll do the trick. Nyeh heh heh... I played Armada 2 long ago so I can't remember the ships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philly Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Yea Id say Defient, cause Voyager is a hunk of scrap...I mean look at the entire VOY series, I doubt that ship could have even survived a borg attack, but somehow they always got out on top.....complete BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now